On 2024-09-19 at 14:11:04, Wei Fang (wei.fang@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> When running "xdp-bench tx eno0" to test the XDP_TX feature of ENETC
> on LS1028A, it was found that if the command was re-run multiple times,
> Rx could not receive the frames, and the result of xdo-bench showed
> that the rx rate was 0.
>
> root@ls1028ardb:~# ./xdp-bench tx eno0
> Hairpinning (XDP_TX) packets on eno0 (ifindex 3; driver fsl_enetc)
> Summary 2046 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
> Summary 0 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
> Summary 0 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
> Summary 0 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
>
> By observing the Rx PIR and CIR registers, we found that CIR is always
> equal to 0x7FF and PIR is always 0x7FE, which means that the Rx ring
> is full and can no longer accommodate other Rx frames. Therefore, it
> is obvious that the RX BD ring has not been cleaned up.
>
> Further analysis of the code revealed that the Rx BD ring will only
> be cleaned if the "cleaned_cnt > xdp_tx_in_flight" condition is met.
> Therefore, some debug logs were added to the driver and the current
> values of cleaned_cnt and xdp_tx_in_flight were printed when the Rx
> BD ring was full. The logs are as follows.
>
> [ 178.762419] [XDP TX] >> cleaned_cnt:1728, xdp_tx_in_flight:2140
> [ 178.771387] [XDP TX] >> cleaned_cnt:1941, xdp_tx_in_flight:2110
> [ 178.776058] [XDP TX] >> cleaned_cnt:1792, xdp_tx_in_flight:2110
>
> From the results, we can see that the maximum value of xdp_tx_in_flight
> has reached 2140. However, the size of the Rx BD ring is only 2048. This
> is incredible, so checked the code again and found that the driver did
> not reset xdp_tx_in_flight when installing or uninstalling bpf program,
> resulting in xdp_tx_in_flight still retaining the value after the last
> command was run.
>
> Fixes: c33bfaf91c4c ("net: enetc: set up XDP program under enetc_reconfigure()")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Sundeep
