6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit db213b0cfe3268d8b1d382b3bcc999c687a2567f ]
If the __qcuefi pointer is not set, then in the original code, we would
hold onto the lock. That means that if we tried to set it later, then
it would cause a deadlock. Drop the lock on the error path. That's
what all the callers are expecting.
Fixes: 759e7a2b62eb ("firmware: Add support for Qualcomm UEFI Secure Application")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/19829bc4-1b6f-47f7-847a-e90c25749e40@stanley.mountain
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom_uefisecapp.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom_uefisecapp.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom_uefisecapp.c
index bc550ad0dbe0..68b2c09ed22c 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom_uefisecapp.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_qseecom_uefisecapp.c
@@ -786,6 +786,10 @@ static int qcuefi_set_reference(struct qcuefi_client *qcuefi)
static struct qcuefi_client *qcuefi_acquire(void)
{
mutex_lock(&__qcuefi_lock);
+ if (!__qcuefi) {
+ mutex_unlock(&__qcuefi_lock);
+ return NULL;
+ }
return __qcuefi;
}
--
2.43.0
