[PATCH 6.1 22/63] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Allocate 1 entry extra in the sinf array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 33297cef3101d950cec0033a0dce0a2d2bd59999 upstream.

Some DSDT-s have an off-by-one bug where the SINF package count is
one higher than the SQTY reported value, allocate 1 entry extra.

Also make the SQTY <-> SINF package count mismatch error more verbose
to help debugging similar issues in the future.

This fixes the panasonic-laptop driver failing to probe() on some
devices with the following errors:

[    3.958887] SQTY reports bad SINF length SQTY: 37 SINF-pkg-count: 38
[    3.958892] Couldn't retrieve BIOS data
[    3.983685] Panasonic Laptop Support - With Macros: probe of MAT0019:00 failed with error -5

Fixes: 709ee531c153 ("panasonic-laptop: add Panasonic Let's Note laptop extras driver v0.94")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tested-by: James Harmison <jharmison@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909113227.254470-2-hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/panasonic-laptop.c
@@ -337,7 +337,8 @@ static int acpi_pcc_retrieve_biosdata(st
 	}
 
 	if (pcc->num_sifr < hkey->package.count) {
-		pr_err("SQTY reports bad SINF length\n");
+		pr_err("SQTY reports bad SINF length SQTY: %lu SINF-pkg-count: %u\n",
+		       pcc->num_sifr, hkey->package.count);
 		status = AE_ERROR;
 		goto end;
 	}
@@ -994,6 +995,12 @@ static int acpi_pcc_hotkey_add(struct ac
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Some DSDT-s have an off-by-one bug where the SINF package count is
+	 * one higher than the SQTY reported value, allocate 1 entry extra.
+	 */
+	num_sifr++;
+
 	pcc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pcc_acpi), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pcc) {
 		pr_err("Couldn't allocate mem for pcc");






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux