On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 10:23:09AM +0000, Hal Feng wrote:
> > On 12.09.24 10:55, WangYuli wrote:
> > + i2srx_pins: i2srx-0 {
> > + clk-sd-pins {
> > + pinmux = <GPIOMUX(38, GPOUT_LOW,
> > + GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > + GPI_SYS_I2SRX_BCLK)>,
> > + <GPIOMUX(63, GPOUT_LOW,
> > + GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > + GPI_SYS_I2SRX_LRCK)>,
> > + <GPIOMUX(38, GPOUT_LOW,
> > + GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > + GPI_SYS_I2STX1_BCLK)>,
> > + <GPIOMUX(63, GPOUT_LOW,
> > + GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > + GPI_SYS_I2STX1_LRCK)>,
> > + <GPIOMUX(61, GPOUT_LOW,
> > + GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > + GPI_SYS_I2SRX_SDIN0)>;
> > + input-enable;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + i2stx1_pins: i2stx1-0 {
> > + sd-pins {
> > + pinmux = <GPIOMUX(44, GPOUT_SYS_I2STX1_SDO0,
> > + GPOEN_ENABLE,
> > + GPI_NONE)>;
> > + bias-disable;
> > + input-disable;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + mclk_ext_pins: mclk-ext-0 {
> > + mclk-ext-pins {
> > + pinmux = <GPIOMUX(4, GPOUT_LOW,
> > + GPOEN_DISABLE,
> > + GPI_SYS_MCLK_EXT)>;
> > + input-enable;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > mmc0_pins: mmc0-0 {
> > rst-pins {
> > pinmux = <GPIOMUX(62, GPOUT_SYS_SDIO0_RST,
>
> The above changes had been reverted in commit e0503d47e93d in the mainline.
> Is it appropriate to merge this patch into the stable branch?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240415125033.86909-1-hannah.peuckmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Hah, I had gone looking this morning because I had a hunch that there
was some missing fix this series didn't, but couldn't remember what it
was. I completely forgot that some of this was non-present overlay
related stuff that had had to be reverted.
So yes, if it had to be reverted in mainline, it shouldn't get
backported. Thanks for spotting that Hal.
Cheers,
Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
