On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 01:31:04PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On 10/09/2024 09:32, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:57:01AM +0800, WangYuli wrote: > > > From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > [ Upstream commit d6cfd1770f20392d7009ae1fdb04733794514fa9 ] > > > > > > The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier after storing > > > to rq->curr, before going back to user-space. The barrier is only > > > needed when switching between processes: the barrier is implied by > > > mmdrop() when switching from kernel to userspace, and it's not needed > > > when switching from userspace to kernel. > > > > > > Rely on the feature/mechanism ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_CALLBACKS and on the > > > primitive membarrier_arch_switch_mm(), already adopted by the PowerPC > > > architecture, to insert the required barrier. > > > > > > Fixes: fab957c11efe2f ("RISC-V: Atomic and Locking Code") > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240131144936.29190-2-parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx > > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/membarrier.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 2 ++ > > > kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++-- > > > 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/membarrier.h > > Now queued up, thanks. > > > The original patch was merged in 6.9 and the Fixes tag points to a commit > introduced in v4.15. So IIUC, this patch should have been backported > "automatically" to the releases < 6.9 right? As stated in the documentation > (process/stable-kernel-rules.html): > > "Note, such tagging is unnecessary if the stable team can derive the > appropriate versions from Fixes: tags." > > Or did we miss something? Yes, you didn't tag cc: stable at all in this commit, which is why we did not see it. The documentation says that :) thanks, greg k-h