6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 57b56d16800e8961278ecff0dc755d46c4575092 ]
The writing of css->cgroup associated with the cgroup root in
rebind_subsystems() is currently protected only by cgroup_mutex.
However, the reading of css->cgroup in both proc_cpuset_show() and
proc_cgroup_show() is protected just by css_set_lock. That makes the
readers susceptible to racing problems like data tearing or caching.
It is also a problem that can be reported by KCSAN.
This can be fixed by using READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() to access
css->cgroup. Alternatively, the writing of css->cgroup can be moved
under css_set_lock as well which is done by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
index 5eca6281d1aa..660817c125e7 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
@@ -1829,9 +1829,9 @@ int rebind_subsystems(struct cgroup_root *dst_root, u16 ss_mask)
RCU_INIT_POINTER(scgrp->subsys[ssid], NULL);
rcu_assign_pointer(dcgrp->subsys[ssid], css);
ss->root = dst_root;
- css->cgroup = dcgrp;
spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
+ css->cgroup = dcgrp;
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dcgrp->e_csets[ss->id]));
list_for_each_entry_safe(cset, cset_pos, &scgrp->e_csets[ss->id],
e_cset_node[ss->id]) {
--
2.43.0
