5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Fernandez Gonzalez <david.fernandez.gonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 48b9a8dabcc3cf5f961b2ebcd8933bf9204babb7 upstream.
When removing a resource from vmci_resource_table in
vmci_resource_remove(), the search is performed using the resource
handle by comparing context and resource fields.
It is possible though to create two resources with different types
but same handle (same context and resource fields).
When trying to remove one of the resources, vmci_resource_remove()
may not remove the intended one, but the object will still be freed
as in the case of the datagram type in vmci_datagram_destroy_handle().
vmci_resource_table will still hold a pointer to this freed resource
leading to a use-after-free vulnerability.
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vmci_handle_is_equal include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h:142 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in vmci_resource_remove+0x3a1/0x410 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c:147
Read of size 4 at addr ffff88801c16d800 by task syz-executor197/1592
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x82/0xa9 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_address_description.constprop.0+0x21/0x366 mm/kasan/report.c:239
__kasan_report.cold+0x7f/0x132 mm/kasan/report.c:425
kasan_report+0x38/0x51 mm/kasan/report.c:442
vmci_handle_is_equal include/linux/vmw_vmci_defs.h:142 [inline]
vmci_resource_remove+0x3a1/0x410 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c:147
vmci_qp_broker_detach+0x89a/0x11b9 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_queue_pair.c:2182
ctx_free_ctx+0x473/0xbe1 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:444
kref_put include/linux/kref.h:65 [inline]
vmci_ctx_put drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:497 [inline]
vmci_ctx_destroy+0x170/0x1d6 drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_context.c:195
vmci_host_close+0x125/0x1ac drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_host.c:143
__fput+0x261/0xa34 fs/file_table.c:282
task_work_run+0xf0/0x194 kernel/task_work.c:164
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:189 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x184/0x189 kernel/entry/common.c:187
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x11b/0x123 kernel/entry/common.c:220
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:302 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x18/0x42 kernel/entry/common.c:313
do_syscall_64+0x41/0x85 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x0
This change ensures the type is also checked when removing
the resource from vmci_resource_table in vmci_resource_remove().
Fixes: bc63dedb7d46 ("VMCI: resource object implementation.")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reported-by: George Kennedy <george.kennedy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Fernandez Gonzalez <david.fernandez.gonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828154338.754746-1-david.fernandez.gonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/vmci_resource.c
@@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ void vmci_resource_remove(struct vmci_re
spin_lock(&vmci_resource_table.lock);
hlist_for_each_entry(r, &vmci_resource_table.entries[idx], node) {
- if (vmci_handle_is_equal(r->handle, resource->handle)) {
+ if (vmci_handle_is_equal(r->handle, resource->handle) &&
+ resource->type == r->type) {
hlist_del_init_rcu(&r->node);
break;
}
