[PATCH 6.10 177/375] perf lock contention: Fix spinlock and rwlock accounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 287bd5cf06e0f2c02293ce942777ad1f18059ed3 ]

The spinlock and rwlock use a single-element per-cpu array to track
current locks due to performance reason.  But this means the key is
always available and it cannot simply account lock stats in the array
because some of them are invalid.

In fact, the contention_end() program in the BPF invalidates the entry
by setting the 'lock' value to 0 instead of deleting the entry for the
hashmap.  So it should skip entries with the lock value of 0 in the
account_end_timestamp().

Otherwise, it'd have spurious high contention on an idle machine:

  $ sudo perf lock con -ab -Y spinlock sleep 3
   contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait         type   caller

           8      4.72 s       1.84 s     590.46 ms     spinlock   rcu_core+0xc7
           8      1.87 s       1.87 s     233.48 ms     spinlock   process_one_work+0x1b5
           2      1.87 s       1.87 s     933.92 ms     spinlock   worker_thread+0x1a2
           3      1.81 s       1.81 s     603.93 ms     spinlock   tmigr_update_events+0x13c
           2      1.72 s       1.72 s     861.98 ms     spinlock   tick_do_update_jiffies64+0x25
           6     42.48 us     13.02 us      7.08 us     spinlock   futex_q_lock+0x2a
           1     13.03 us     13.03 us     13.03 us     spinlock   futex_wake+0xce
           1     11.61 us     11.61 us     11.61 us     spinlock   rcu_core+0xc7

I don't believe it has contention on a spinlock longer than 1 second.
After this change, it only reports some small contentions.

  $ sudo perf lock con -ab -Y spinlock sleep 3
   contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait         type   caller

           4    133.51 us     43.29 us     33.38 us     spinlock   tick_do_update_jiffies64+0x25
           4     69.06 us     31.82 us     17.27 us     spinlock   process_one_work+0x1b5
           2     50.66 us     25.77 us     25.33 us     spinlock   rcu_core+0xc7
           1     28.45 us     28.45 us     28.45 us     spinlock   rcu_core+0xc7
           1     24.77 us     24.77 us     24.77 us     spinlock   tmigr_update_events+0x13c
           1     23.34 us     23.34 us     23.34 us     spinlock   raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x15

Fixes: b5711042a1c8 ("perf lock contention: Use per-cpu array map for spinlocks")
Reported-by: Xi Wang <xii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240828052953.1445862-1-namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c
index b4cb3fe5cc25..bc4e92c0c08b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_lock_contention.c
@@ -286,6 +286,9 @@ static void account_end_timestamp(struct lock_contention *con)
 			goto next;
 
 		for (int i = 0; i < total_cpus; i++) {
+			if (cpu_data[i].lock == 0)
+				continue;
+
 			update_lock_stat(stat_fd, -1, end_ts, aggr_mode,
 					 &cpu_data[i]);
 		}
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux