Re: [PATCH 5.10.y v2] memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10.y v2] memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr
From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:56:19 +0200
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tomas Krcka <krckatom@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240909145557.78179-1-krckatom@amazon.de>

On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 02:55:57PM +0000, Tomas Krcka wrote:
> From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> commit 9972605a238339b85bd16b084eed5f18414d22db upstream.
> 

Thanks, all now queued up.

greg k-h

References:
- FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
  - From: gregkh
- [PATCH 5.10.y v2] memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr
  - From: Tomas Krcka

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net] net: tighten bad gso csum offset check in virtio_net_hdr
Next by Date: [PATCH 4.19] net, sunrpc: Remap EPERM in case of connection failure in xs_tcp_setup_socket
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5.10.y v2] memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr
Next by thread: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memcg: protect concurrent access to mem_cgroup_idr" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux