On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 02:40:10PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sriov.c
> > @@ -1096,8 +1096,10 @@ int ice_sriov_set_msix_vec_count(struct pci_dev *vf_dev, int msix_vec_count)
> > return -ENOENT;
> >
> > vsi = ice_get_vf_vsi(vf);
> > - if (!vsi)
> > + if (!vsi) {
> > + ice_put_vf(vf);
> > return -ENOENT;
> > + }
> >
> > prev_msix = vf->num_msix;
> > prev_queues = vf->num_vf_qs;
> > @@ -1142,8 +1144,10 @@ int ice_sriov_set_msix_vec_count(struct pci_dev *vf_dev, int msix_vec_count)
> > vf->num_msix = prev_msix;
> > vf->num_vf_qs = prev_queues;
> > vf->first_vector_idx = ice_sriov_get_irqs(pf, vf->num_msix);
> > - if (vf->first_vector_idx < 0)
> > + if (vf->first_vector_idx < 0) {
> > + ice_put_vf(vf);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> >
> > if (needs_rebuild) {
> > ice_vf_reconfig_vsi(vf);
>
> Would you like to collaborate with any goto chains according to
> the desired completion of exception handling?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
