On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:50:11PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2024/2/8 16:11, Wu Bo wrote: > > On 2024/2/5 11:54, Chao Yu wrote: > > > How about calling f2fs_balance_fs() to double check and make sure there is > > > enough free space for following allocation. > > > > > > if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, > > > GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, overprovision_segments(sbi)))) { > > > f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock); > > > stat_inc_gc_call_count(sbi, FOREGROUND); > > > err = f2fs_gc(sbi, &gc_control); > > > if (err == -EAGAIN) > > > f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true); > > > if (err && err != -ENODATA) > > > goto out_err; > > > } > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > f2fs_balance_fs() here will not change procedure branch and may just trigger another GC. > > > > I'm afraid this is a bit redundant. > > Okay. > > I guess maybe Jaegeuk has concern which is the reason to commit > 2e42b7f817ac ("f2fs: stop allocating pinned sections if EAGAIN happens"). Hi Jaegeuk, We occasionally receive user complaints about OTA failures caused by this issue. Please consider merging this patch. Thanks > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > Linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel