6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit cea4066588308fa932b6b03486c608efff1d761c ] We did deinit CAM in STA iteration in VIF loop. But, the STA iteration missed to restrict the target VIF. So, if there are multiple VIFs, we would deinit a CAM multiple times. Now, fix it. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://msgid.link/20240509090646.35304-2-pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c index c1644353053f..01b17b8f4ff9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/ser.c @@ -308,9 +308,13 @@ static void ser_reset_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif) static void ser_sta_deinit_cam_iter(void *data, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) { - struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif = (struct rtw89_vif *)data; - struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = rtwvif->rtwdev; + struct rtw89_vif *target_rtwvif = (struct rtw89_vif *)data; struct rtw89_sta *rtwsta = (struct rtw89_sta *)sta->drv_priv; + struct rtw89_vif *rtwvif = rtwsta->rtwvif; + struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev = rtwvif->rtwdev; + + if (rtwvif != target_rtwvif) + return; if (rtwvif->net_type == RTW89_NET_TYPE_AP_MODE || sta->tdls) rtw89_cam_deinit_addr_cam(rtwdev, &rtwsta->addr_cam); -- 2.43.0
