6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Alex Hung <alex.hung@xxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 8e2734bf444767fed787305ccdcb36a2be5301a2 ] [WHY & HOW] Make sure vmid0p72_idx, vnom0p8_idx and vmax0p9_idx calculation will never overflow and exceess array size. This fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@xxxxxxx> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c index 0c4a8fe8e5ca..f1cde1e4265f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/dcn_calcs.c @@ -1453,10 +1453,9 @@ void dcn_bw_update_from_pplib_fclks( ASSERT(fclks->num_levels); vmin0p65_idx = 0; - vmid0p72_idx = fclks->num_levels - - (fclks->num_levels > 2 ? 3 : (fclks->num_levels > 1 ? 2 : 1)); - vnom0p8_idx = fclks->num_levels - (fclks->num_levels > 1 ? 2 : 1); - vmax0p9_idx = fclks->num_levels - 1; + vmid0p72_idx = fclks->num_levels > 2 ? fclks->num_levels - 3 : 0; + vnom0p8_idx = fclks->num_levels > 1 ? fclks->num_levels - 2 : 0; + vmax0p9_idx = fclks->num_levels > 0 ? fclks->num_levels - 1 : 0; dc->dcn_soc->fabric_and_dram_bandwidth_vmin0p65 = 32 * (fclks->data[vmin0p65_idx].clocks_in_khz / 1000.0) / 1000.0; -- 2.43.0
