On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 10:18:27AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 1:23 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 05:23:46PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 1:11 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 05:30:08PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 4:55 PM Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2024-08-12 11:00, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As some of you have noticed, there's a TON of failure messages being > > > > > > > sent out for AMD gpu driver commits that are tagged for stable > > > > > > > backports. In short, you all are doing something really wrong with how > > > > > > > you are tagging these. > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > > > > > I got notifications about one KFD patch failing to apply on six branches > > > > > > (6.10, 6.6, 6.1, 5.15, 5.10 and 5.4). The funny thing is, that you > > > > > > already applied this patch on two branches back in May. The emails had a > > > > > > suspicious looking date in the header (Sep 17, 2001). I wonder if there > > > > > > was some date glitch that caused a whole bunch of patches to be re-sent > > > > > > to stable somehow: > > > > > > > > > > I think the crux of the problem is that sometimes patches go into > > > > > -next with stable tags and they end getting taken into -fixes as well > > > > > so after the merge window they end up getting picked up for stable > > > > > again. Going forward, if they land in -next, I'll cherry-pick -x the > > > > > changes into -fixes so there is better traceability. > > > > > > > > Please do so, and also work to not have duplicate commits like this in > > > > different branches. Git can handle merges quite well, please use it. > > > > > > > > If this shows up again in the next -rc1 merge window without any > > > > changes, I'll have to just blackhole all amd drm patches going forward > > > > until you all tell me you have fixed your development process. > > > > > > Just a heads up, you will see some of these when the 6.12 merge window > > > due to what is currently in -next and the fixes that went into 6.11, > > > but going forward we have updated our process and it should be better. > > > > Can you give me a list of the git ids that I should be ignoring for > > 6.12-rc1? Otherwise again, it's a huge waste of time on my side trying > > to sift through them and figure out if the rejection is real or not... > > 8151a6c13111 drm/amd/display: Skip Recompute DSC Params if no Stream on Link > fbfb5f034225 drm/amdgpu: fix contiguous handling for IB parsing v2 > ec0d7abbb0d4 drm/amd/display: Fix Potential Null Dereference > 332315885d3c drm/amd/display: Remove ASSERT if significance is zero in > math_ceil2 > 295d91cbc700 drm/amd/display: Check for NULL pointer > 6472de66c0aa drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix uninitialized variable warnings > 93381e6b6180 drm/amdgpu: fix a possible null pointer dereference > 7a38efeee6b5 drm/radeon: fix null pointer dereference in radeon_add_common_modes Please resend this after -rc1 is out, so we don't have to hunt for it again. thanks, greg k-h
