On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:32 PM Parth Pancholi <parth105105@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Emanuele Ghidoli <emanuele.ghidoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On a few platforms such as TI's AM69 device, disable_irq()
> fails to keep track of the interrupts that happen between
> disable_irq() and enable_irq() and those interrupts are missed.
> Use the ->irq_unmask() and ->irq_mask() methods instead
> of ->irq_enable() and ->irq_disable() to correctly keep track of
> edges when disable_irq is called.
> This solves the issue of disable_irq() not working as expected
> on such platforms.
>
> Fixes: 23265442b02b ("ARM: davinci: irq_data conversion.")
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Ghidoli <emanuele.ghidoli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Parth Pancholi <parth.pancholi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
It looks good to me but I'd like to have an Ack from Keerthy on this.
Bart
