5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Joseph Huang <Joseph.Huang@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 528876d867a23b5198022baf2e388052ca67c952 ]
If an ATU violation was caused by a CPU Load operation, the SPID could
be larger than DSA_MAX_PORTS (the size of mv88e6xxx_chip.ports[] array).
Fixes: 75c05a74e745 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix counting of ATU violations")
Signed-off-by: Joseph Huang <Joseph.Huang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819235251.1331763-1-Joseph.Huang@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c
index 1a4781a44e0d7..79377ceb66af5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c
@@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
trace_mv88e6xxx_atu_full_violation(chip->dev, spid,
entry.portvec, entry.mac,
fid);
- chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++;
+ if (spid < ARRAY_SIZE(chip->ports))
+ chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++;
}
mv88e6xxx_reg_unlock(chip);
--
2.43.0
