5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
commit ccbfcac05866ebe6eb3bc6d07b51d4ed4fcde436 upstream.
The recent addition of a sanity check for a too low start tick time
seems breaking some applications that uses aloop with a certain slave
timer setup. They may have the initial resolution 0, hence it's
treated as if it were a too low value.
Relax and skip the check for the slave timer instance for addressing
the regression.
Fixes: 4a63bd179fa8 ("ALSA: timer: Set lower bound of start tick time")
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/6294
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240810084833.10939-1-tiwai@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/core/timer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/sound/core/timer.c
+++ b/sound/core/timer.c
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static int snd_timer_start1(struct snd_t
/* check the actual time for the start tick;
* bail out as error if it's way too low (< 100us)
*/
- if (start) {
+ if (start && !(timer->hw.flags & SNDRV_TIMER_HW_SLAVE)) {
if ((u64)snd_timer_hw_resolution(timer) * ticks < 100000) {
result = -EINVAL;
goto unlock;
