6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 98c0cc48e27e9d269a3e4db2acd72b486c88ec77 ]
policy_unpack_test fails on big endian systems because data byte order
is expected to be little endian but is generated in host byte order.
This results in test failures such as:
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:150
Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
(u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
not ok 3 policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:164
Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
(u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
Add the missing endianness conversions when generating test data.
Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack")
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
index 5c9bde25e56df..2b8003eb4f463 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c
@@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1;
strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U32_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1) = AA_U32;
- *((u32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U32_DATA;
+ *((__le32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le32(TEST_U32_DATA);
buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET;
*buf = AA_NAME;
*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1;
strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_U64_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1) = AA_U64;
- *((u64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U64_DATA;
+ *((__le64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le64(TEST_U64_DATA);
buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET;
*buf = AA_NAME;
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf,
*(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1;
strscpy(buf + 3, TEST_ARRAY_NAME, e->end - (void *)(buf + 3));
*(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1) = AA_ARRAY;
- *((u16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_ARRAY_SIZE;
+ *((__le16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le16(TEST_ARRAY_SIZE);
return e;
}
--
2.43.0
