On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 04:45:12PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 22:35:27 +0800 > > > Hi, > > > >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.48 release. > >> There are 341 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >> let me know. > >> > >> Responses should be made by Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:37:36 +0000. > >> Anything received after that time might be too late. > >> > >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.48-rc1.gz > >> or in the git tree and branch at: > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y > >> and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > We need a patch > > upsteam: 0a04ff09bcc39e0044190ffe9f00f998f13647c > > From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: tools: move alignment-related macros to new <linux/align.h> > > to fix the new build error. > > tools/include/linux/bitmap.h: In function 'bitmap_zero': > > tools/include/linux/bitmap.h:28:29: warning: implicit declaration of > > function 'ALIGN' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > #define bitmap_size(nbits) (ALIGN(nbits, BITS_PER_LONG) / BITS_PER_BYTE) > > Patch 29/341 and its dependencies 26-28 is an improvement, not a fix. Do > we need it in the LTS kernels? I'm fine with that, just asking as > usually LTSes only receive critical fixes :> It's to fix a build issue due to other commits wanting to use ALIGN in tools/ I've queued it up now, thanks! greg k-h
