On Wed Aug 21, 2024 at 1:02 PM EEST, Dmitrii Kuvaiskii wrote: > Two enclave threads may try to add and remove the same enclave page > simultaneously (e.g., if the SGX runtime supports both lazy allocation > and MADV_DONTNEED semantics). Consider some enclave page added to the > enclave. User space decides to temporarily remove this page (e.g., > emulating the MADV_DONTNEED semantics) on CPU1. At the same time, user > space performs a memory access on the same page on CPU2, which results > in a #PF and ultimately in sgx_vma_fault(). Scenario proceeds as > follows: > > /* > * CPU1: User space performs > * ioctl(SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_REMOVE_PAGES) > * on enclave page X > */ > sgx_encl_remove_pages() { > > mutex_lock(&encl->lock); > > entry = sgx_encl_load_page(encl); > /* > * verify that page is > * trimmed and accepted > */ > > mutex_unlock(&encl->lock); > > /* > * remove PTE entry; cannot > * be performed under lock > */ > sgx_zap_enclave_ptes(encl); > /* > * Fault on CPU2 on same page X > */ > sgx_vma_fault() { > /* > * PTE entry was removed, but the > * page is still in enclave's xarray > */ > xa_load(&encl->page_array) != NULL -> > /* > * SGX driver thinks that this page > * was swapped out and loads it > */ > mutex_lock(&encl->lock); > /* > * this is effectively a no-op > */ > entry = sgx_encl_load_page_in_vma(); > /* > * add PTE entry > * > * *BUG*: a PTE is installed for a > * page in process of being removed > */ > vmf_insert_pfn(...); > > mutex_unlock(&encl->lock); > return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; > } > /* > * continue with page removal > */ > mutex_lock(&encl->lock); > > sgx_encl_free_epc_page(epc_page) { > /* > * remove page via EREMOVE > */ > /* > * free EPC page > */ > sgx_free_epc_page(epc_page); > } > > xa_erase(&encl->page_array); > > mutex_unlock(&encl->lock); > } > > Here, CPU1 removed the page. However CPU2 installed the PTE entry on the > same page. This enclave page becomes perpetually inaccessible (until > another SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_REMOVE_PAGES ioctl). This is because the page is > marked accessible in the PTE entry but is not EAUGed, and any subsequent > access to this page raises a fault: with the kernel believing there to > be a valid VMA, the unlikely error code X86_PF_SGX encountered by code > path do_user_addr_fault() -> access_error() causes the SGX driver's > sgx_vma_fault() to be skipped and user space receives a SIGSEGV instead. > The userspace SIGSEGV handler cannot perform EACCEPT because the page > was not EAUGed. Thus, the user space is stuck with the inaccessible > page. > > Fix this race by forcing the fault handler on CPU2 to back off if the > page is currently being removed (on CPU1). This is achieved by > setting SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BUSY flag right-before the first mutex_unlock() in > sgx_encl_remove_pages(). Upon loading the page, CPU2 checks whether this > page is busy, and if yes then CPU2 backs off and waits until the page is > completely removed. After that, any memory access to this page results > in a normal "allocate and EAUG a page on #PF" flow. > > Additionally fix a similar race: user space converts a normal enclave > page to a TCS page (via SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_MODIFY_TYPES) on CPU1, and at > the same time, user space performs a memory access on the same page on > CPU2. This fix is not strictly necessary (this particular race would > indicate a bug in a user space application), but it gives a consistent > rule: if an enclave page is under certain operation by the kernel with > the mapping removed, then other threads trying to access that page are > temporarily blocked and should retry. > > Fixes: 9849bb27152c ("x86/sgx: Support complete page removal") > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Kuvaiskii <dmitrii.kuvaiskii@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h | 3 ++- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h > index b566b8ad5f33..96b11e8fb770 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h > @@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ > /* 'desc' bits holding the offset in the VA (version array) page. */ > #define SGX_ENCL_PAGE_VA_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK_ULL(11, 3) > > -/* 'desc' bit indicating that the page is busy (being reclaimed). */ > +/* 'desc' bit indicating that the page is busy (being reclaimed, removed or > + * converted to a TCS page). */ > #define SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BUSY BIT(2) > > /* > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > index 5d390df21440..ee619f2b3414 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c > @@ -969,12 +969,22 @@ static long sgx_enclave_modify_types(struct sgx_encl *encl, > /* > * Do not keep encl->lock because of dependency on > * mmap_lock acquired in sgx_zap_enclave_ptes(). > + * > + * Releasing encl->lock leads to a data race: while CPU1 > + * performs sgx_zap_enclave_ptes() and removes the PTE > + * entry for the enclave page, CPU2 may attempt to load > + * this page (because the page is still in enclave's > + * xarray). To prevent CPU2 from loading the page, mark > + * the page as busy before unlock and unmark after lock > + * again. > */ > + entry->desc |= SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BUSY; > mutex_unlock(&encl->lock); > > sgx_zap_enclave_ptes(encl, addr); > > mutex_lock(&encl->lock); > + entry->desc &= ~SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BUSY; > > sgx_mark_page_reclaimable(entry->epc_page); > } > @@ -1141,7 +1151,14 @@ static long sgx_encl_remove_pages(struct sgx_encl *encl, > /* > * Do not keep encl->lock because of dependency on > * mmap_lock acquired in sgx_zap_enclave_ptes(). > + * > + * Releasing encl->lock leads to a data race: while CPU1 > + * performs sgx_zap_enclave_ptes() and removes the PTE entry > + * for the enclave page, CPU2 may attempt to load this page > + * (because the page is still in enclave's xarray). To prevent > + * CPU2 from loading the page, mark the page as busy. > */ > + entry->desc |= SGX_ENCL_PAGE_BUSY; > mutex_unlock(&encl->lock); > > sgx_zap_enclave_ptes(encl, addr); Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> BR, Jarkko