On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 08:12:54PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 09:38:53AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:45:29PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > So, I now see this has actually been merged into stable without getting > > > to the bottom of why it's helping anything... this is a bit worrying > > > since it's adding new functionality and not really a bug fix. It'd have > > > been good to at least get a followup here. > > > Do you want me to revert something from the stable tree? If so, has it > > also been reverted upstream? > > The patch just isn't an obvious -stable patch - it's adding new > functionality, not fixing a bug, and I was surprised to discover it had > been added as a result. It's fine as new functionality and therefore > hasn't been reverted upstream. > > We can probably leave it there, though if this is OK that's a bit of a > change, but if this new functionality is a good fix then we're probably > leaving other systems unfixed which isn't good, I would be very much > happier if we understood what had changed here. If new functionality is > OK there's a probably a bunch of other changes we should be pulling > back. New functionality shouldn't be added, but sometimes things slip in due to the volume of patches and how people word-smith changelog entries :( greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html