6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit e255683c06df572ead96db5efb5d21be30c0efaa upstream.
If no subflow is attached to the 'signal' endpoint that is being
removed, the addr ID will not be marked as available again.
Mark the linked ID as available when removing the address entry from the
list to cover this case.
Fixes: b6c08380860b ("mptcp: remove addr and subflow in PM netlink")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819-net-mptcp-pm-reusing-id-v1-1-38035d40de5b@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -1462,7 +1462,10 @@ static bool mptcp_pm_remove_anno_addr(st
ret = remove_anno_list_by_saddr(msk, addr);
if (ret || force) {
spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
- msk->pm.add_addr_signaled -= ret;
+ if (ret) {
+ __set_bit(addr->id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap);
+ msk->pm.add_addr_signaled--;
+ }
mptcp_pm_remove_addr(msk, &list);
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
}
