6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 1474bc87fe57deac726cc10203f73daa6c3212f7 ]
This might seem pretty pointless rather than changing the locking
immediately, but it seems safer to run for a while with checks and
the old locking scheme, and then remove the wdev lock later.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/wireless/core.h | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/core.h b/net/wireless/core.h
index f0a3a23176385..c955be6c6daa4 100644
--- a/net/wireless/core.h
+++ b/net/wireless/core.h
@@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ void cfg80211_register_wdev(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
static inline void wdev_lock(struct wireless_dev *wdev)
__acquires(wdev)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wdev->wiphy->mtx);
mutex_lock(&wdev->mtx);
__acquire(wdev->mtx);
}
@@ -235,11 +236,16 @@ static inline void wdev_lock(struct wireless_dev *wdev)
static inline void wdev_unlock(struct wireless_dev *wdev)
__releases(wdev)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wdev->wiphy->mtx);
__release(wdev->mtx);
mutex_unlock(&wdev->mtx);
}
-#define ASSERT_WDEV_LOCK(wdev) lockdep_assert_held(&(wdev)->mtx)
+static inline void ASSERT_WDEV_LOCK(struct wireless_dev *wdev)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wdev->wiphy->mtx);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wdev->mtx);
+}
static inline bool cfg80211_has_monitors_only(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev)
{
--
2.43.0
