On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 04:52:42PM +0800, Hailong Liu wrote: > The __vmap_pages_range_noflush() assumes its argument pages** contains > pages with the same page shift. However, since commit e9c3cda4d86e ("mm, > vmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations"), if gfp_flags includes > __GFP_NOFAIL with high order in vm_area_alloc_pages() and page allocation > failed for high order, the pages** may contain two different page shifts > (high order and order-0). This could lead __vmap_pages_range_noflush() to > perform incorrect mappings, potentially resulting in memory corruption. > > Users might encounter this as follows (vmap_allow_huge = true, 2M is for > PMD_SIZE): > > kvmalloc(2M, __GFP_NOFAIL|GFP_X) > __vmalloc_node_range_noprof(vm_flags=VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP) > vm_area_alloc_pages(order=9) ---> order-9 allocation failed and fallback to order-0 > vmap_pages_range() > vmap_pages_range_noflush() > __vmap_pages_range_noflush(page_shift = 21) ----> wrong mapping happens > > We can remove the fallback code because if a high-order allocation fails, > __vmalloc_node_range_noprof() will retry with order-0. Therefore, it is > unnecessary to fallback to order-0 here. Therefore, fix this by removing > the fallback code. > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240808122019.3361-1-hailong.liu@xxxxxxxx > Fixes: e9c3cda4d86e ("mm, vmalloc: fix high order __GFP_NOFAIL allocations") > Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu <hailong.liu@xxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Tangquan Zheng <zhengtangquan@xxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Barry Song <baohua@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > (cherry picked from commit 61ebe5a747da649057c37be1c37eb934b4af79ca) > Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu <hailong.liu@xxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/vmalloc.c | 11 ++--------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c > index c5e30b52844c..a0b650f50faa 100644 > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c > @@ -2992,15 +2992,8 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid, > page = alloc_pages(alloc_gfp, order); > else > page = alloc_pages_node(nid, alloc_gfp, order); > - if (unlikely(!page)) { > - if (!nofail) > - break; > - > - /* fall back to the zero order allocations */ > - alloc_gfp |= __GFP_NOFAIL; > - order = 0; > - continue; > - } > + if (unlikely(!page)) > + break; > > /* > * Higher order allocations must be able to be treated as > -- > 2.25.1 > > Now queued up, thanks. greg k-h