3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 89669e7a7f96be3ee8d9a22a071d7c0d3b4428fc upstream. The commit "vmwgfx: Rework fence event action" introduced a number of bugs that are fixed with this commit: a) A forgotten return stateemnt. b) An if statement with identical branches. Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c | 17 ++++++----------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c @@ -1049,6 +1049,8 @@ int vmw_event_fence_action_create(struct if (ret != 0) goto out_no_queue; + return 0; + out_no_queue: event->base.destroy(&event->base); out_no_event: @@ -1123,17 +1125,10 @@ int vmw_fence_event_ioctl(struct drm_dev BUG_ON(fence == NULL); - if (arg->flags & DRM_VMW_FE_FLAG_REQ_TIME) - ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence, - arg->flags, - arg->user_data, - true); - else - ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence, - arg->flags, - arg->user_data, - true); - + ret = vmw_event_fence_action_create(file_priv, fence, + arg->flags, + arg->user_data, + true); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) { if (ret != -ERESTARTSYS) DRM_ERROR("Failed to attach event to fence.\n"); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html