Re: [PATCH] gfs2: fix double destroy_workqueue error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2024年8月20日周二 22:22写道:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 5:32 AM Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > When gfs2_fill_super() fails, destroy_workqueue()
> > is called within gfs2_gl_hash_clear(), and the
> > subsequent code path calls destroy_workqueue()
> > on the same work queue again.
> >
> > This issue can be fixed by setting the work
> > queue pointer to NULL after the first
> > destroy_workqueue() call and checking for
> > a NULL pointer before attempting to destroy
> > the work queue again.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+d34c2a269ed512c531b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d34c2a269ed512c531b0
> > Fixes: 30e388d57367 ("gfs2: Switch to a per-filesystem glock workqueue")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/gfs2/glock.c      | 1 +
> >  fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 3 ++-
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> > index 12a769077ea0..4775c2cb8ae1 100644
> > --- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> > +++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
> > @@ -2249,6 +2249,7 @@ void gfs2_gl_hash_clear(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
> >         gfs2_free_dead_glocks(sdp);
> >         glock_hash_walk(dump_glock_func, sdp);
> >         destroy_workqueue(sdp->sd_glock_wq);
> > +       sdp->sd_glock_wq = NULL;
>
> Here, sdp->sd_glock_wq is set to NULL,
>
> >  }
> >
> >  static const char *state2str(unsigned state)
> > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
> > index ff1f3e3dc65c..c1a7ff713c84 100644
> > --- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
> > +++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
> > @@ -1305,7 +1305,8 @@ static int gfs2_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
> >         gfs2_delete_debugfs_file(sdp);
> >         gfs2_sys_fs_del(sdp);
> >  fail_delete_wq:
> > -       destroy_workqueue(sdp->sd_delete_wq);
> > +       if (sdp->sd_delete_wq)
> > +               destroy_workqueue(sdp->sd_delete_wq);
>
>
> > but here, we check if sdp->sd_delete_wq is NULL? That doesn't make sense.
Oh... I see. Sorry for this stupid mistake. I will correct it and send
a patch v2.
>
> >  fail_glock_wq:
> >         destroy_workqueue(sdp->sd_glock_wq);
> >  fail_free:
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>

Thanks,
-- 
Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@xxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux