Re: [PATCH 6.2.y] jfs: define xtree root and page independently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 08:36:41PM +0200, Sergio González Collado wrote:
> From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [ Upstream commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656 ]
> 
> In order to make array bounds checking sane, provide a separate
> definition of the in-inode xtree root and the external xtree page.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Manas Ghandat <ghandatmanas@xxxxxxxxx>
> (cherry picked from commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656)
> Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@xxxxxxxxx>

You submitted this for a lot of kernel trees that are not supported at
all (i.e. end-of-life).  There's nothing we can do with those backports,
sorry.

You can always see the active kernel versions on the front page of
kernel.org.

thanks,

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux