5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3f29f6537f54d74e64bac0a390fb2e26da25800d ]
folio_wait_writeback() requires that no spinlocks are held and that
a folio reference is held, as documented. After we dropped the PTL, the
folio could get freed concurrently. So grab a temporary reference.
Fixes: 214d9bbcd3a6 ("s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests")
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240508182955.358628-2-david@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kernel/uv.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
index 8c73d4901e145..03a8a9a52186a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
@@ -320,6 +320,13 @@ int gmap_make_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, void *uvcb)
rc = make_folio_secure(folio, uvcb);
folio_unlock(folio);
}
+
+ /*
+ * Once we drop the PTL, the folio may get unmapped and
+ * freed immediately. We need a temporary reference.
+ */
+ if (rc == -EAGAIN)
+ folio_get(folio);
}
unlock:
pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptelock);
@@ -332,6 +339,7 @@ int gmap_make_secure(struct gmap *gmap, unsigned long gaddr, void *uvcb)
* completion, this is just a useless check, but it is safe.
*/
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
+ folio_put(folio);
} else if (rc == -EBUSY) {
/*
* If we have tried a local drain and the folio refcount
--
2.43.0
