[PATCH 5.4 083/259] pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: Drop if block with always false condition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 88b3f108502bc45e6ebd005702add46759f3f45a ]

ti_iodelay_remove() is only called after ti_iodelay_probe() completed
successfully. In this case platform_set_drvdata() was called with a
non-NULL argument and so platform_get_drvdata() won't return NULL.

Simplify by removing the if block with the always false condition.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009083856.222030-4-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: 9b401f4a7170 ("pinctrl: ti: ti-iodelay: fix possible memory leak when pinctrl_enable() fails")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
index b522ca0103325..b597504ae6a46 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ti/pinctrl-ti-iodelay.c
@@ -906,9 +906,6 @@ static int ti_iodelay_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ti_iodelay_device *iod = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
-	if (!iod)
-		return 0;
-
 	if (iod->pctl)
 		pinctrl_unregister(iod->pctl);
 
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux