Re: [PATCH net] net: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

The 6.6.y branch has the patch already in the stable queue -> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/commit/?id=3e713b73c01fac163a5c8cb0953d1e300407a773, and it should be available in the 6.6.46 upcoming minor.

Thanks, Adrian.
________________________________________
From: Christian Heusel
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2024 1:05 PM
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Greg KH; Adrian Vladu; willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx; alexander.duyck@xxxxxxxxx; arefev@xxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; willemb@xxxxxxxxxx; regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr


On 24/08/14 05:54AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 11:46:30AM +0200, Christian Heusel wrote:

> > On 24/08/08 11:52AM, Christian Heusel wrote:

> > > On 24/08/08 08:38AM, Greg KH wrote:

> > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:34:48PM +0200, Christian Heusel wrote:

> > > > > On 24/08/07 04:12PM, Greg KH wrote:

> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 09:28:29PM +0000, avladu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> > > > > > > Hello,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > This patch needs to be backported to the stable 6.1.x and 6.64.x branches, as the initial patch https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/e269d79c7d35aa3808b1f3c1737d63dab504ddc8 was backported a few days ago: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/include/linux/virtio_net.h?h=3Dv6.1.103&id=3D5b1997487a3f3373b0f580c8a20b56c1b64b0775

> > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/include/linux/virtio_net.h?h=3Dv6.6.44&id=3D90d41ebe0cd4635f6410471efc1dd71b33e894cf

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Please provide a working backport, the change does not properly

> > > > > > cherry-pick.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > greg k-h

> > > > >

> > > > > Hey Greg, hey Sasha,

> > > > >

> > > > > this patch also needs backporting to the 6.6.y and 6.10.y series as the

> > > > > buggy commit was backported to to all three series.

> > > >

> > > > What buggy commit?

> > >

> > > The issue is that commit e269d79c7d35 ("net: missing check virtio")

> > > introduces a bug which is fixed by 89add40066f9 ("net: drop bad gso

> > > csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr") which it also carries a

> > > "Fixes:" tag for.

> > >

> > > Therefore it would be good to also get 89add40066f9 backported.

> > >

> > > > And how was this tested, it does not apply cleanly to the trees for me

> > > > at all.

> > >

> > > I have tested this with the procedure as described in [0]:

> > >

> > >     $ git switch linux-6.10.y

> > >     $ git cherry-pick -x 89add40066f9ed9abe5f7f886fe5789ff7e0c50e

> > >     Auto-merging net/ipv4/udp_offload.c

> > >     [linux-6.10.y fbc0d2bea065] net: drop bad gso csum_start and offset in virtio_net_hdr

> > >      Author: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>

> > >      Date: Mon Jul 29 16:10:12 2024 -0400

> > >      3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

> > >

> > > This also works for linux-6.6.y, but not for linux-6.1.y, as it fails

> > > with a merge error there.

> > >

> > > The relevant commit is confirmed to fix the issue in the relevant Githu

> > > issue here[1]:

> > >

> > >     @marek22k commented

> > >     > They both fix the problem for me.

> > >

> > > > confused,

> > >

> > > Sorry for the confusion! I hope the above clears things up a little :)

> > >

> > > > greg k-h

> > >

> > > Cheers,

> > > Christian

> > >

> > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2024060624-platinum-ladies-9214@gregkh/

> > > [1]: https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/13041#issuecomment-2272326491

> >

> > Since I didn't hear from anybody so far about the above issue it's a bit

> > unclear on how to proceed here. I still think that I would make sense to

> > go with my above suggestion about patching at least 2 out of the 3

> > stable series where the patch applies cleanly.

> >

> >      ~ Chris

>

>

>

> Do what Greg said:

>

>        Please provide a working backport, the change does not properly

>        cherry-pick.

>

> that means, post backported patches to stable, copy list.



Alright, will do!






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux