From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 63447b7dd40c6a9ae8d3bb70c11f4c46731823e3 ] Currently sctx->stat.last_physical only got updated in the following cases: - When the last stripe of a non-RAID56 chunk is scrubbed This implies a pitfall, if the last stripe is at the chunk boundary, and we finished the scrub of the whole chunk, we won't update last_physical at all until the next chunk. - When a P/Q stripe of a RAID56 chunk is scrubbed This leads the following two problems: - sctx->stat.last_physical is not updated for a almost full chunk This is especially bad, affecting scrub resume, as the resume would start from last_physical, causing unnecessary re-scrub. - "btrfs scrub status" will not report any progress for a long time Fix the problem by properly updating @last_physical after each stripe is scrubbed. And since we're here, for the sake of consistency, use spin lock to protect the update of @last_physical, just like all the remaining call sites touching sctx->stat. Reported-by: Michel Palleau <michel.palleau@xxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAMFk-+igFTv2E8svg=cQ6o3e6CrR5QwgQ3Ok9EyRaEvvthpqCQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index 9712169593980..731d7d562db1a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -1875,6 +1875,9 @@ static int flush_scrub_stripes(struct scrub_ctx *sctx) stripe = &sctx->stripes[i]; wait_scrub_stripe_io(stripe); + spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); + sctx->stat.last_physical = stripe->physical + stripe_length(stripe); + spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); scrub_reset_stripe(stripe); } out: @@ -2143,7 +2146,9 @@ static int scrub_simple_mirror(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, cur_physical, &found_logical); if (ret > 0) { /* No more extent, just update the accounting */ + spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); sctx->stat.last_physical = physical + logical_length; + spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); ret = 0; break; } @@ -2340,6 +2345,10 @@ static noinline_for_stack int scrub_stripe(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, stripe_logical += chunk_logical; ret = scrub_raid56_parity_stripe(sctx, scrub_dev, bg, map, stripe_logical); + spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); + sctx->stat.last_physical = min(physical + BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, + physical_end); + spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); if (ret) goto out; goto next; -- 2.43.0
