Thanks for pointing that out. I will review this, and send it to all relevant branches. On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 16:37, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:13:15PM +0200, Sergio González Collado wrote: > > From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > [ Upstream commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656 ] > > > > In order to make array bounds checking sane, provide a separate > > definition of the in-inode xtree root and the external xtree page. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Manas Ghandat <ghandatmanas@xxxxxxxxx> > > (cherry picked from commit a779ed754e52d582b8c0e17959df063108bd0656) > > Signed-off-by: Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: syzbot+6b1d79dad6cc6b3eef41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > What about 6.6.y? We can't take commits only to older kernels, that > would mean you would have a regression. > > Please resubmit for all relevant branches. > > greg k-h
