[PATCH 6.10 045/263] rcutorture: Fix rcu_torture_fwd_cb_cr() data race

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 6040072f4774a575fa67b912efe7722874be337b ]

On powerpc systems, spinlock acquisition does not order prior stores
against later loads.  This means that this statement:

	rfcp->rfc_next = NULL;

Can be reordered to follow this statement:

	WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp);

Which is then a data race with rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr(), specifically,
this statement:

	rfcpn = READ_ONCE(rfcp->rfc_next)

KCSAN located this data race, which represents a real failure on powerpc.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 807fbf6123a77..251cead744603 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ static void rcu_torture_fwd_cb_cr(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rfp->rcu_fwd_lock, flags);
 	rfcpp = rfp->rcu_fwd_cb_tail;
 	rfp->rcu_fwd_cb_tail = &rfcp->rfc_next;
-	WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp);
+	smp_store_release(rfcpp, rfcp);
 	WRITE_ONCE(rfp->n_launders_cb, rfp->n_launders_cb + 1);
 	i = ((jiffies - rfp->rcu_fwd_startat) / (HZ / FWD_CBS_HIST_DIV));
 	if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(rfp->n_launders_hist))
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux