6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
This reverts commit 052c9f0c140c78e5d6826688b5d2f33e19db0ae7.
If the test doesn't pass, we can get this error:
# ./simult_flows.sh: line 275: mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky: command not found
This patch is not needed in v6.6: it is there to mark a test as "flaky",
but the MPTCP selftests infrastructure in v6.6 doesn't support them. So
it looks better to revert this patch.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $small $large $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $large $small $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ run_test 10 10 0 0 "balanced bwidth"
run_test 10 10 1 25 "balanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
# we still need some additional infrastructure to pass the following test-cases
-MPTCP_LIB_SUBTEST_FLAKY=1 run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
+run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
run_test 10 3 1 25 "unbalanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
run_test 10 3 25 1 "unbalanced bwidth with opposed, unbalanced delay"
