6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit fba8334721e266f92079632598e46e5f89082f30 ] When all the strides in a WQE have been consumed, the WQE is unlinked from the WQ linked list (mlx5_wq_ll_pop()). For SHAMPO, it is possible to receive CQEs with 0 consumed strides for the same WQE even after the WQE is fully consumed and unlinked. This triggers an additional unlink for the same wqe which corrupts the linked list. Fix this scenario by accepting 0 sized consumed strides without unlinking the WQE again. Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603212219.1037656-4-tariqt@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c index 8d9743a5e42c7..79ec6fcc9e259 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c @@ -2374,6 +2374,9 @@ static void mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq_shampo(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5_cq if (likely(wi->consumed_strides < rq->mpwqe.num_strides)) return; + if (unlikely(!cstrides)) + return; + wq = &rq->mpwqe.wq; wqe = mlx5_wq_ll_get_wqe(wq, wqe_id); mlx5_wq_ll_pop(wq, cqe->wqe_id, &wqe->next.next_wqe_index); -- 2.43.0
