6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 41e71dbb0e0a0fe214545fe64af031303a08524c ] Guenter reported dodgy crashes on an i386-nosmp build using GCC-11 that had the form of endless traps until entry stack exhaust and then #DF from the stack guard. It turned out that pti_clone_pgtable() had alignment assumptions on the start address, notably it hard assumes start is PMD aligned. This is true on x86_64, but very much not true on i386. These assumptions can cause the end condition to malfunction, leading to a 'short' clone. Guess what happens when the user mapping has a short copy of the entry text? Use the correct increment form for addr to avoid alignment assumptions. Fixes: 16a3fe634f6a ("x86/mm/pti: Clone kernel-image on PTE level for 32 bit") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240731163105.GG33588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/mm/pti.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c index 51b6b78e6b175..f7d1bbe76eb94 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c @@ -374,14 +374,14 @@ pti_clone_pgtable(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, */ *target_pmd = *pmd; - addr += PMD_SIZE; + addr = round_up(addr + 1, PMD_SIZE); } else if (level == PTI_CLONE_PTE) { /* Walk the page-table down to the pte level */ pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr); if (pte_none(*pte)) { - addr += PAGE_SIZE; + addr = round_up(addr + 1, PAGE_SIZE); continue; } @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ pti_clone_pgtable(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, /* Clone the PTE */ *target_pte = *pte; - addr += PAGE_SIZE; + addr = round_up(addr + 1, PAGE_SIZE); } else { BUG(); -- 2.43.0