Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] cpuidle: teo: Remove recent intercepts metric

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Christian Loehle wrote:
> commit 449914398083148f93d070a8aace04f9ec296ce3 upstream.
> 
> The logic for recent intercepts didn't work, there is an underflow
> of the 'recent' value that can be observed during boot already, which
> teo usually doesn't recover from, making the entire logic pointless.
> Furthermore the recent intercepts also were never reset, thus not
> actually being very 'recent'.
> 
> Having underflowed 'recent' values lead to teo always acting as if
> we were in a scenario were expected sleep length based on timers is
> too high and it therefore unnecessarily selecting shallower states.
> 
> Experiments show that the remaining 'intercept' logic is enough to
> quickly react to scenarios in which teo cannot rely on the timer
> expected sleep length.
> 
> See also here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0ce2d536-1125-4df8-9a5b-0d5e389cd8af@xxxxxxx/
> 
> Fixes: 77577558f25d ("cpuidle: teo: Rework most recent idle duration values treatment")
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240628095955.34096-3-christian.loehle@xxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/teo.c | 79 ++++++---------------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

We can't just take a 6.1.y backport without newer kernels also having
this fix.  Can you resend this as backports for all relevant kernels
please?

thanks,

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux