Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Fix latency of DSTS while receiving wakeup event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024, Prashanth K wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07-08-24 05:21 am, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024, Prashanth K wrote:
> > > When operating in High-Speed, it is observed that DSTS[USBLNKST] doesn't
> > > update link state immediately after receiving the wakeup interrupt. Since
> > > wakeup event handler calls the resume callbacks, there is a chance that
> > > function drivers can perform an ep queue. Which in turn tries to perform
> > > remote wakeup from send_gadget_ep_cmd(), this happens because DSTS[[21:18]
> > > wasn't updated to U0 yet. It is observed that the latency of DSTS can be
> > > in order of milli-seconds. Hence update the dwc->link_state from evtinfo,
> > > and use this variable to prevent calling remote wakup unnecessarily.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: ecba9bc9946b ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Check for L1/L2/U3 for Start Transfer")
> > 
> > This commit ID is corrupted. Please check.
> > 
> Will fix it, was supposed to be 63c4c320ccf7, thanks for pointing out.
> 
> > While operating in usb2 speed, if the device is in low power link state
> > (L1/L2), CMDACT may not complete and time out. The programming guide
> > suggested to initiate remote wakeup to bring the device to ON state,
> > allowing the command to go through. However, clearing the
> 
> Yea true, we need ensure that the linkstate is not in L1/L2/U3 for HS/SS.
> But since we are relying on DSTS for this, we may issue remote-wakeup to
> host even when not needed. During host initiated wakeup scenario, we get a
> wakeup interrupt which calls function driver resume calls. If function
> driver queues something, then startxfer has to be issued, but DSTS was still
> showing U3 instead of U0. When checked with our design team, they mentioned
> the latency in DSTS is expected since and latency would be in msec order
> from Resume to U0. Can you please confirm this once, I simply added a
> polling mechanism in wakeup handler.

No need for this polling. When you receive wakeup event, it's already in
the state that you can issue Start Transfer command.

> 
> @@ -4175,6 +4177,14 @@ static void dwc3_gadget_wakeup_interrupt(struct dwc3
> *dwc, unsigned int evtinfo)
>          * TODO take core out of low power mode when that's
>          * implemented.
>          */
> +       while (retries++ < 20000) {
> +               reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_DSTS);
> +               /* in HS, means ON */
> +               if (DWC3_DSTS_USBLNKST(reg) == DWC3_LINK_STATE_U0)
> +                       break;
> +               udelay(2);
> +       }
> +       pr_info("DWC3 Wakeup: %d", retries);
> 
> And turns out, retries 1500 to 15000 (worst case), which can range from 3ms
> to 30ms. By this time, control can reach startXfer, where it tries to
> perform remote-wakeup even if host just resumed the gadget.

Polling for 20K time is a bit much, and this will vary depending on
different setup. This is something that I want to fix in the wakeup()
ops and keep everything async.

> 
> For SS case, this retries count was consistently 1, it was passing in first
> try itself. But unfortunately doesn't behave the same way in HS.
> 
> > GUSB2PHYCFG.suspendusb2 turns on the signal required to complete a
> > command within 50us. This happens within the timeout required for an
> > endpoint command. As a result, there's no need to perform remote wakeup.
> > 
> > For usb3 speed, if it's in U3, the gadget is in suspend anyway. There
> > will be no ep_queue to trigger the Start Transfer command.
> > 
> > You can just remove the whole Start Transfer check for remote wakeup
> > completely.
> > 
> Sorry, i didnt understand your suggestion. The startxfer check is needed as
> per databook, but we also need to handle the latency seen in DSTS when
> operating in HS.
> 

usb_ep_queue should not trigger remote wakeup; it should be done by
wakeup() ops. The programming guide just noted that the Start Transfer
command should not be issued while in L1/L2/U3. It suggested to wake up
the host to bring it out of L1/L2/U3 state so the command can go
through.

My suggestion is to remove the L1/L2/U3 check in
dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd(), and it will still work fine with reasons
noted previously. So, just do this:

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index 0ea2ca0f0d28..6ef6c4ef2a7b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -411,30 +411,6 @@ int dwc3_send_gadget_ep_cmd(struct dwc3_ep *dep, unsigned int cmd,
                        dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYCFG(0), reg);
        }

-       if (DWC3_DEPCMD_CMD(cmd) == DWC3_DEPCMD_STARTTRANSFER) {
-               int link_state;
-
-               /*
-                * Initiate remote wakeup if the link state is in U3 when
-                * operating in SS/SSP or L1/L2 when operating in HS/FS. If the
-                * link state is in U1/U2, no remote wakeup is needed. The Start
-                * Transfer command will initiate the link recovery.
-                */
-               link_state = dwc3_gadget_get_link_state(dwc);
-               switch (link_state) {
-               case DWC3_LINK_STATE_U2:
-                       if (dwc->gadget->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER)
-                               break;
-
-                       fallthrough;
-               case DWC3_LINK_STATE_U3:
-                       ret = __dwc3_gadget_wakeup(dwc, false);
-                       dev_WARN_ONCE(dwc->dev, ret, "wakeup failed --> %d\n",
-                                       ret);
-                       break;
-               }
-       }
-
        /*
         * For some commands such as Update Transfer command, DEPCMDPARn
         * registers are reserved. Since the driver often sends Update Transfer

When we receive the wakeup event, then the device is no longer in
L1/L2/U3. The Start Tranfer command should go through.

We do have an issue where if the function driver issues remote wakeup,
the link may not transition before ep_queue() because wakeup() can be
async. In that case, you probably want to keep the usb_requests in the
pending_list until the link_state transitions out of low power.

The other thing that I noted previously is that I want to fix is the
wakeup() ops. Currently it can be async or synchronous. We should keep
it consistent and make it async throughout.

BR,
Thinh




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux