[PATCH 6.1 60/86] net/mlx5: Lag, dont use the hardcoded value of the first port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mark Bloch <mbloch@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 3fda84dc090390573cfbd0b1d70372663315de21 ]

The cited commit didn't change the body of the loop as it should.
It shouldn't be using MLX5_LAG_P1.

Fixes: 7e978e7714d6 ("net/mlx5: Lag, use actual number of lag ports")
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240730061638.1831002-5-tariqt@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c
index a283d8ae466b6..4b4d761081115 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c
@@ -1483,7 +1483,7 @@ u8 mlx5_lag_get_slave_port(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
 		goto unlock;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ldev->ports; i++) {
-		if (ldev->pf[MLX5_LAG_P1].netdev == slave) {
+		if (ldev->pf[i].netdev == slave) {
 			port = i;
 			break;
 		}
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux