6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 0aa3ca956c46d849775eae1816cef8fe4bc8b50e ]
This function has a nested loop. The problem is that both the inside
and outside loop use the same variable as an iterator. I found this
via static analysis so I'm not sure the impact. It could be that it
loops forever or, more likely, the loop exits early.
Fixes: 3a616b92a9d1 ("net: mvpp2: Add TX flow control support for jumbo frames")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/eaa8f403-7779-4d81-973d-a9ecddc0bf6f@stanley.mountain
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
index 9adf4301c9b1d..a40b631188866 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
@@ -953,13 +953,13 @@ static void mvpp2_bm_pool_update_fc(struct mvpp2_port *port,
static void mvpp2_bm_pool_update_priv_fc(struct mvpp2 *priv, bool en)
{
struct mvpp2_port *port;
- int i;
+ int i, j;
for (i = 0; i < priv->port_count; i++) {
port = priv->port_list[i];
if (port->priv->percpu_pools) {
- for (i = 0; i < port->nrxqs; i++)
- mvpp2_bm_pool_update_fc(port, &port->priv->bm_pools[i],
+ for (j = 0; j < port->nrxqs; j++)
+ mvpp2_bm_pool_update_fc(port, &port->priv->bm_pools[j],
port->tx_fc & en);
} else {
mvpp2_bm_pool_update_fc(port, port->pool_long, port->tx_fc & en);
--
2.43.0
