6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3ba359c0cd6eb5ea772125a7aededb4a2d516684 ]
RCU use in bond_should_notify_peers() looks wrong, since it does
rcu_dereference(), leaves the critical section, and uses the
pointer after that.
Luckily, it's called either inside a nested RCU critical section
or with the RTNL held.
Annotate it with rcu_dereference_rtnl() instead, and remove the
inner RCU critical section.
Fixes: 4cb4f97b7e36 ("bonding: rebuild the lock use for bond_mii_monitor()")
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240719094119.35c62455087d.I68eb9c0f02545b364b79a59f2110f2cf5682a8e2@changeid
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index d19aabf5d4fba..2ed0da0684906 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1121,13 +1121,10 @@ static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
return bestslave;
}
+/* must be called in RCU critical section or with RTNL held */
static bool bond_should_notify_peers(struct bonding *bond)
{
- struct slave *slave;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ struct slave *slave = rcu_dereference_rtnl(bond->curr_active_slave);
if (!slave || !bond->send_peer_notif ||
bond->send_peer_notif %
--
2.43.0
