6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit eef0532e900c20a6760da829e82dac3ee18688c5 ]
Run bpf_tcp_ca selftests (./test_progs -t bpf_tcp_ca) on a Loongarch
platform, some "Segmentation fault" errors occur:
'''
test_dctcp:PASS:bpf_dctcp__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_dctcp:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
#29/1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:FAIL
test_cubic:PASS:bpf_cubic__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_cubic:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
#29/2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:FAIL
test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:dctcp_skel 0 nsec
test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:bpf_dctcp__load 0 nsec
test_dctcp_fallback:FAIL:dctcp link unexpected error: -524
#29/4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:FAIL
test_write_sk_pacing:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec
test_write_sk_pacing:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
#29/6 bpf_tcp_ca/write_sk_pacing:FAIL
test_update_ca:PASS:open 0 nsec
test_update_ca:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
settcpca:FAIL:setsockopt unexpected setsockopt: \
actual -1 == expected -1
(network_helpers.c:99: errno: No such file or directory) \
Failed to call post_socket_cb
start_test:FAIL:start_server_str unexpected start_server_str: \
actual -1 == expected -1
test_update_ca:FAIL:ca1_ca1_cnt unexpected ca1_ca1_cnt: \
actual 0 <= expected 0
#29/9 bpf_tcp_ca/update_ca:FAIL
#29 bpf_tcp_ca:FAIL
Caught signal #11!
Stack trace:
./test_progs(crash_handler+0x28)[0x5555567ed91c]
linux-vdso.so.1(__vdso_rt_sigreturn+0x0)[0x7ffffee408b0]
./test_progs(bpf_link__update_map+0x80)[0x555556824a78]
./test_progs(+0x94d68)[0x5555564c4d68]
./test_progs(test_bpf_tcp_ca+0xe8)[0x5555564c6a88]
./test_progs(+0x3bde54)[0x5555567ede54]
./test_progs(main+0x61c)[0x5555567efd54]
/usr/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x22208)[0x7ffff2aaa208]
/usr/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xac)[0x7ffff2aaa30c]
./test_progs(_start+0x48)[0x55555646bca8]
Segmentation fault
'''
This is because BPF trampoline is not implemented on Loongarch yet,
"link" returned by bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() is NULL. test_progs
crashs when this NULL link passes to bpf_link__update_map(). This
patch adds NULL checks for all links in bpf_tcp_ca to fix these errors.
If "link" is NULL, goto the newly added label "out" to destroy the skel.
v2:
- use "goto out" instead of "return" as Eduard suggested.
Fixes: 06da9f3bd641 ("selftests/bpf: Test switching TCP Congestion Control algorithms.")
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b4c841492bd4ed97964e4e61e92827ce51bf1dc9.1720615848.git.tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 4aabeaa525d47..d0d9a02415454 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -396,7 +396,8 @@ static void test_update_ca(void)
return;
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
- ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+ goto out;
do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
@@ -410,6 +411,7 @@ static void test_update_ca(void)
ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca2_cnt, 0, "ca2_ca2_cnt");
bpf_link__destroy(link);
+out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
@@ -425,7 +427,8 @@ static void test_update_wrong(void)
return;
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
- ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+ goto out;
do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
@@ -438,6 +441,7 @@ static void test_update_wrong(void)
ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
bpf_link__destroy(link);
+out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
@@ -452,7 +456,8 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
return;
link_nl = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_no_link);
- ASSERT_OK_PTR(link_nl, "attach_struct_ops_nl");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link_nl, "attach_struct_ops_nl"))
+ goto out;
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
@@ -465,6 +470,7 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
+out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
@@ -507,7 +513,8 @@ static void test_link_replace(void)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_2);
- ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd"))
+ goto out;
/* BPF_F_REPLACE with a wrong old map Fd. It should fail!
*
@@ -530,6 +537,7 @@ static void test_link_replace(void)
bpf_link__destroy(link);
+out:
tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
}
--
2.43.0
