6.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 37f7707077f5ea2515bf4b1dc7fad43f8e12993e ]
The hardware only supports a single period length for both PWM outputs. So
atmel_tcb_pwm_config() checks the configuration of the other output if it's
compatible with the currently requested setting. The register values are
then actually updated in atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(). To make this race free
the lock must be held during the whole process, so grab the lock in
.apply() instead of individually in atmel_tcb_pwm_disable() and
atmel_tcb_pwm_enable() which then also covers atmel_tcb_pwm_config().
To simplify handling, use the guard helper to let the compiler care for
unlocking. Otherwise unlocking would be more difficult as there is more
than one exit path in atmel_tcb_pwm_apply().
Fixes: 9421bade0765 ("pwm: atmel: add Timer Counter Block PWM driver")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240709101806.52394-3-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
index 528e54c5999d8..aca11493239a5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip,
tcbpwm->period = 0;
tcbpwm->div = 0;
- spin_lock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
+ guard(spinlock)(&tcbpwmc->lock);
+
regmap_read(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), &cmr);
/*
* Get init config from Timer Counter registers if
@@ -107,7 +108,6 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip,
cmr |= ATMEL_TC_WAVE | ATMEL_TC_WAVESEL_UP_AUTO | ATMEL_TC_EEVT_XC0;
regmap_write(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), cmr);
- spin_unlock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ static void atmel_tcb_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (tcbpwm->duty == 0)
polarity = !polarity;
- spin_lock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
regmap_read(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), &cmr);
/* flush old setting and set the new one */
@@ -172,8 +171,6 @@ static void atmel_tcb_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
ATMEL_TC_SWTRG);
tcbpwmc->bkup.enabled = 0;
}
-
- spin_unlock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
}
static int atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
@@ -194,7 +191,6 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (tcbpwm->duty == 0)
polarity = !polarity;
- spin_lock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
regmap_read(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CMR), &cmr);
/* flush old setting and set the new one */
@@ -256,7 +252,6 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
regmap_write(tcbpwmc->regmap, ATMEL_TC_REG(tcbpwmc->channel, CCR),
ATMEL_TC_SWTRG | ATMEL_TC_CLKEN);
tcbpwmc->bkup.enabled = 1;
- spin_unlock(&tcbpwmc->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -341,9 +336,12 @@ static int atmel_tcb_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
static int atmel_tcb_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
const struct pwm_state *state)
{
+ struct atmel_tcb_pwm_chip *tcbpwmc = to_tcb_chip(chip);
int duty_cycle, period;
int ret;
+ guard(spinlock)(&tcbpwmc->lock);
+
if (!state->enabled) {
atmel_tcb_pwm_disable(chip, pwm, state->polarity);
return 0;
--
2.43.0
