July 29, 2024 at 11:15 AM, "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 29.07.24 10:47, Christian Heusel wrote: > > > > > On 24/07/29 10:35AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > > > > > > > > [+Greg +stable] > > > > > > On 29.07.24 10:16, Lin, Wayne wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the report. > > > > Patch fa57924c76d995 ("drm/amd/display: Refactor function dm_dp_mst_is_port_support_mode()") > > > > is kind of correcting problems causing by commit: > > > > 4df96ba6676034 ("drm/amd/display: Add timing pixel encoding for mst mode validation") > > > > Sorry if it misses fixes tag and would suggest to backport to fix it. Thanks! > > > > > > > > Greg, seem it would be wise to pick up fa57924c76d995 for 6.10.y as > > > > > > well, despite a lack of Fixes or stable tags. > > > > > > Ciao, Thorsten > > > > > > > > > > > The issue is that the fixing commit does not apply to the 6.10 series > > > > without conflict and the offending commit does not revert cleanly > > > > aswell. > > > > Hah, many thx, I should have checked that. > > Lin, Wayne: could you maybe help out here and provide something for 6.10.y? > > Ciao, Thorsten > I reverted 4df96ba6676034 from v6.10.2 from the stable/linux git, resolving the conflict by removing everything that git marked as from the current branch and kept everything marked as from before the branch to merge. That resulted in a patch that is fixing the problem on my machine. Since I don't understand what the code is actually doing it might break things on other machines.