On Sat 27-07-24 20:47:19, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > [ Upstream commit 23cc6ef6fd453b13502caae23130844e7d6ed0fe ] Sasha, this commit is only about silencing false-positive UBSAN warning. Not sure if it is really a stable material... Honza > > Running syzkaller with the newly enabled signed integer overflow > sanitizer produces this report: > > [ 195.401651] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 195.404808] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../fs/open.c:321:15 > [ 195.408739] 9223372036854775807 + 562984447377399 cannot be represented in type 'loff_t' (aka 'long long') > [ 195.414683] CPU: 1 PID: 703 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00039-g14de58dbe653-dirty #11 > [ 195.420138] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 > [ 195.425804] Call Trace: > [ 195.427360] <TASK> > [ 195.428791] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0 > [ 195.431150] handle_overflow+0x171/0x1b0 > [ 195.433640] vfs_fallocate+0x459/0x4f0 > ... > [ 195.490053] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 195.493146] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in ../fs/open.c:321:61 > [ 195.497030] 9223372036854775807 + 562984447377399 cannot be represented in type 'loff_t' (aka 'long long) > [ 195.502940] CPU: 1 PID: 703 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc2-00039-g14de58dbe653-dirty #11 > [ 195.508395] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 > [ 195.514075] Call Trace: > [ 195.515636] <TASK> > [ 195.517000] dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0 > [ 195.519255] handle_overflow+0x171/0x1b0 > [ 195.521677] vfs_fallocate+0x4cb/0x4f0 > [ 195.524033] __x64_sys_fallocate+0xb2/0xf0 > > Historically, the signed integer overflow sanitizer did not work in the > kernel due to its interaction with `-fwrapv` but this has since been > changed [1] in the newest version of Clang. It was re-enabled in the > kernel with Commit 557f8c582a9ba8ab ("ubsan: Reintroduce signed overflow > sanitizer"). > > Let's use the check_add_overflow helper to first verify the addition > stays within the bounds of its type (long long); then we can use that > sum for the following check. > > Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432 [1] > Closes: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/356 > Cc: linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240513-b4-sio-vfs_fallocate-v2-1-db415872fb16@xxxxxxxxxx > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/open.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c > index 278b3edcda444..1dd123ba34ee9 100644 > --- a/fs/open.c > +++ b/fs/open.c > @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ int vfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) > { > struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); > long ret; > + loff_t sum; > > if (offset < 0 || len <= 0) > return -EINVAL; > @@ -319,8 +320,11 @@ int vfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) > if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && !S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) > return -ENODEV; > > - /* Check for wrap through zero too */ > - if (((offset + len) > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) || ((offset + len) < 0)) > + /* Check for wraparound */ > + if (check_add_overflow(offset, len, &sum)) > + return -EFBIG; > + > + if (sum > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) > return -EFBIG; > > if (!file->f_op->fallocate) > -- > 2.43.0 > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR