5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit 124e7c61deb27d758df5ec0521c36cf08d417f7a upstream. ext4_abort will eventually call ext4_errno_to_code, which translates the errno to an EXT4_ERR specific error. This means that ext4_abort expects an errno. By using EXT4_ERR_ here, it gets misinterpreted (as an errno), and ends up saving EXT4_ERR_EBUSY on the superblock during an abort, which makes no sense. ESHUTDOWN will get properly translated to EXT4_ERR_SHUTDOWN, so use that instead. Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026173302.84000-1-krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -5887,7 +5887,7 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_blo } if (ext4_test_mount_flag(sb, EXT4_MF_FS_ABORTED)) - ext4_abort(sb, EXT4_ERR_ESHUTDOWN, "Abort forced by user"); + ext4_abort(sb, ESHUTDOWN, "Abort forced by user"); sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~SB_POSIXACL) | (test_opt(sb, POSIX_ACL) ? SB_POSIXACL : 0);
