6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 393da6cbb2ff89aadc47683a85269f913aa1c139 ] ftrace_graph_ret_addr() takes an `idx` integer pointer that is used to optimize the stack unwinding. Pass it a valid pointer to utilize the optimizations that might be available in the future. The commit is making riscv's usage of ftrace_graph_ret_addr() match x86_64. Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240618145820.62112-1-puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c index 0d3f00eb0baee..10e311b2759d3 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg) { unsigned long fp, sp, pc; + int graph_idx = 0; int level = 0; if (regs) { @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, pc = regs->ra; } else { fp = frame->fp; - pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra, + pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, &graph_idx, frame->ra, &frame->ra); if (pc == (unsigned long)ret_from_exception) { if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc))) -- 2.43.0
