Re: [PATCH] ceph: force sending a cap update msg back to MDS for revoke op

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Xiubo,

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 4:10 PM <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If a client sends out a cap update dropping caps with the prior 'seq'
> just before an incoming cap revoke request, then the client may drop
> the revoke because it believes it's already released the requested
> capabilities.
>
> This causes the MDS to wait indefinitely for the client to respond
> to the revoke. It's therefore always a good idea to ack the cap
> revoke request with the bumped up 'seq'.
>
> Currently if the cap->issued equals to the newcaps the check_caps()
> will do nothing, we should force flush the caps.
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61782
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/caps.c  | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  fs/ceph/super.h |  7 ++++---
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> index 24c31f795938..ba5809cf8f02 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> @@ -2024,6 +2024,8 @@ bool __ceph_should_report_size(struct ceph_inode_info *ci)
>   *  CHECK_CAPS_AUTHONLY - we should only check the auth cap
>   *  CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH - we should flush any dirty caps immediately, without
>   *    further delay.
> + *  CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH_FORCE - we should flush any caps immediately, without
> + *    further delay.
>   */
>  void ceph_check_caps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int flags)
>  {
> @@ -2105,7 +2107,7 @@ void ceph_check_caps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int flags)
>         }
>
>         doutc(cl, "%p %llx.%llx file_want %s used %s dirty %s "
> -             "flushing %s issued %s revoking %s retain %s %s%s%s\n",
> +             "flushing %s issued %s revoking %s retain %s %s%s%s%s\n",
>              inode, ceph_vinop(inode), ceph_cap_string(file_wanted),
>              ceph_cap_string(used), ceph_cap_string(ci->i_dirty_caps),
>              ceph_cap_string(ci->i_flushing_caps),
> @@ -2113,7 +2115,8 @@ void ceph_check_caps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int flags)
>              ceph_cap_string(retain),
>              (flags & CHECK_CAPS_AUTHONLY) ? " AUTHONLY" : "",
>              (flags & CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH) ? " FLUSH" : "",
> -            (flags & CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL) ? " NOINVAL" : "");
> +            (flags & CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL) ? " NOINVAL" : "",
> +            (flags & CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH_FORCE) ? " FLUSH_FORCE" : "");
>
>         /*
>          * If we no longer need to hold onto old our caps, and we may
> @@ -2223,6 +2226,9 @@ void ceph_check_caps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int flags)
>                                 goto ack;
>                 }
>
> +               if (flags & CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH_FORCE)
> +                       goto ack;

Maybe check this early on inside the

        for (p = rb_first(&ci->i_caps); p; p = rb_next(p)) {


        }

loop?

> +
>                 /* things we might delay */
>                 if ((cap->issued & ~retain) == 0)
>                         continue;     /* nope, all good */
> @@ -3518,6 +3524,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct inode *inode,
>         bool queue_invalidate = false;
>         bool deleted_inode = false;
>         bool fill_inline = false;
> +       int flags = 0;
>
>         /*
>          * If there is at least one crypto block then we'll trust
> @@ -3751,6 +3758,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct inode *inode,
>         /* don't let check_caps skip sending a response to MDS for revoke msgs */
>         if (le32_to_cpu(grant->op) == CEPH_CAP_OP_REVOKE) {
>                 cap->mds_wanted = 0;
> +               flags |= CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH_FORCE;
>                 if (cap == ci->i_auth_cap)
>                         check_caps = 1; /* check auth cap only */
>                 else
> @@ -3806,9 +3814,9 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct inode *inode,
>
>         mutex_unlock(&session->s_mutex);
>         if (check_caps == 1)
> -               ceph_check_caps(ci, CHECK_CAPS_AUTHONLY | CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL);
> +               ceph_check_caps(ci, flags | CHECK_CAPS_AUTHONLY | CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL);
>         else if (check_caps == 2)
> -               ceph_check_caps(ci, CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL);
> +               ceph_check_caps(ci, flags | CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL);
>  }
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/super.h b/fs/ceph/super.h
> index b0b368ed3018..831e8ec4d5da 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/super.h
> +++ b/fs/ceph/super.h
> @@ -200,9 +200,10 @@ struct ceph_cap {
>         struct list_head caps_item;
>  };
>
> -#define CHECK_CAPS_AUTHONLY   1  /* only check auth cap */
> -#define CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH      2  /* flush any dirty caps */
> -#define CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL    4  /* don't invalidate pagecache */
> +#define CHECK_CAPS_AUTHONLY     1  /* only check auth cap */
> +#define CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH        2  /* flush any dirty caps */
> +#define CHECK_CAPS_NOINVAL      4  /* don't invalidate pagecache */
> +#define CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH_FORCE  8  /* force flush any caps */
>
>  struct ceph_cap_flush {
>         u64 tid;
> --
> 2.45.1
>


-- 
Cheers,
Venky






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux