On 7/14/24 01:14, botta633 wrote:
From: Ahmed Ehab <bottaawesome633@xxxxxxxxx>
Preventing lockdep_set_subclass from creating a new instance of the
string literal. Hence, we will always have the same class->name among
parent and subclasses. This prevents kernel panics when looking up a
lock class while comparing class locks and class names.
Reported-by: <syzbot+7f4a6f7f7051474e40ad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: fd5e3f5fe27
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ahmed Ehab <bottaawesome633@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 08b0d1d9d78b..df8fa5929de7 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static inline void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
(lock)->dep_map.lock_type)
#define lockdep_set_subclass(lock, sub) \
- lockdep_init_map_type(&(lock)->dep_map, #lock, (lock)->dep_map.key, sub,\
+ lockdep_init_map_type(&(lock)->dep_map, (lock)->dep_map.name, (lock)->dep_map.key, sub,\
(lock)->dep_map.wait_type_inner, \
(lock)->dep_map.wait_type_outer, \
(lock)->dep_map.lock_type)
ext4 is a filesystem. It has nothing to do with locking/lockdep. Could
you resend the patches with the proper prefix of "lockdep:" or
"locking/lockdep:"?
Thanks,
Longman