On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:10:11PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 16:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.98 release. > > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.98-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > We have two major regressions. > > 1) > As I have reported on 6.9.9-rc1 same kernel BUG and panic noticed [1] > while running kunit tests on all test environments [1] seen on 6.1.98-rc1. > > BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xb0/0x17c > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsqkB4=pVZyELyj3YqUc9jXFfgNULsPk9t8q-+P1w_G6A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > 2) > S390 build failed due to following build errors on 6.1 and 6.6. > Build error: > ---- > arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:253:11: error: expected ';' at end > of declaration > 253 | psw_t psw __uninitialized; > | ^ > | ; > [2] https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2j0YAKrnHmvjt4fKPfYoEmSKWlG/ Thanks, I'll go drop this from 6.6 and older queues now, seems that __unitialized doesn't work on older kernels just yet. thanks, greg k-h
